Feminist tyranny refers to government-supported procedures that clearly deny fundamental rights including constitutional due process to men and fathers under the guise of assuring a 'greater good'. That greater good espouses the safety of women and the best interests of the child.
The feminist system is a sham for controlling society. But it's well-funded and well propagandized. This article summarizes the issues of this tyranny, how it has spread and the growing recognition of how it works to destroy society and the rights of fathers.
Feminism was accepted by most as simply fostering equal opportunity for women. So, government-funded programs came into being to promote this.
The growth of feminist tyranny:
Unfortunately, the money and efforts put into these programs began to support far more than equal opportunity for women. Those in charge found that it opened up an opportunity to direct society in ways that abridged the rights of men and fathers - and their equal rights. Control - not equal opportunity -became their agenda.
Their growing power with government funding allowed perverse changes in the laws - changes that denied the constitutional protection for men and fathers against false accusations. Feminist-instigated government policies and laws view their intentions as a 'greater good' than the rights that keep all of us free. That's the hallmark of tyranny.
A fact of freedom:
There's no greater good than the preservation of your fundamental rights. Those rights include your right to life, liberty, property, self-determination, and your right to parent by direct support and care of your children.
One critical and fundamental right - left to government - is the 'due process' it must adhere to before denying you any fundamental right. In a nutshell, you must have done something seriously wrong and the government - through a trial process with a jury of your peers - must be presented with evidence that's beyond a reasonable doubt for a criminal wrong, or that's clear and convincing for a civil wrong. Not having your 'right to due process' means losing all other rights by a judge's whim.
Feminist propaganda:
But the 'due process' right is precisely what feminist tyranny voids. They invariably propagandize that the safety of women (or best interest of children) needs to take precedence over fundamental and the due process rights of men or fathers. They don't say this precisely, but that's what their efforts have produced.
They also push propaganda about the 'evils' of men and the 'victimhood' of women. It vilifies those it would unjustly persecute while championing those it favors without scrutiny. A convincing propaganda blinds an unwary public to persecution occurring. Nazi propaganda used this approach. As Goebels said, "Just lie enough 'til they believe you".
Feminist tyranny attacks the underbelly of society - the family. Through divorce and the 'new' domestic violence laws, fathers and other men - without the due process to protect the innocent - are thrown out of their family and effectively enslaved to pay for their persecution.
Fathers Rights groups have protested the lack of due process - and lack of equal rights - in divorce and paternity results. But they're easily smothered by the government-subsidized and highly funded women's propaganda machines - and their political clout.
The spreading of the feminist tyranny:
The effectiveness and organization of the feminist system in the U.S. has allowed it to institute Women's Issues-type organizations not only in other countries but into charities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that oversee aid and its direction in underdeveloped countries. Their input invariably undermines traditional families in favor of the feminist tyranny model of society.
India protests feminist tyranny:
The feminist tyranny instituted within India's family-related laws has now caused Indian family and men's associations to react to the destruction of rights it causes. These protesting groups recognize the feminist tyranny's system.
They say that under the innocuous guise of women's rights and women's empowerment, radical feminists have systematically destroyed the institutions of family and marriage in most Western countries. They directed their attack at the so-called "developing" nations like India, which is known for its strong family culture and marriage values, and where the only means of social security is the extended family.
The weapons and tactics employed in feminist terrorism are:
* Hate speech against men and family
* Fabricated and false statistics
* Blatant lies
* Opportunistic arm-twisting, guilt-tripping and bullying
* Draconian gender-biased laws
This feminist system has successfully hijacked the concepts of fairness and equality under law, sabotaged the ideals and goals of democracy, slaughtered human rights and are insisting on a Taliban-like regime in every nation. The fallout of this global gender war is a steep rise in divorce rates, number of fatherless children, violence against men, number of men ending their own lives, number of "unwanted" pregnancies and juvenile crimes.
Feminist terrorism is one of the worst dangers faced by all nations today, and the threat transcends all social, economic and religious barriers. Civilized and respectable citizens of all countries, religions, and socio-economic groups should actively counter such feminist terrorism for the sake of the well-being of our families, communities, our future generations and freedom.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Bio Hazards - The New Terrorism Threat
Once the province of science fiction movies, biological hazard or bio hazard cleanup companies now have become an important part of our country's landscape and it is anticipated that they will continue to play a significant role in helping society maintain a safe environment that does not pose high risks to our health. The need for these bio-hazard cleaning companies derives from the potential of terrorists to attack using biological weapons such as a "dirty bomb". Bio hazard clean up companies have secured a niche in our emergency response efforts or homeland security system. First of all, there is an obvious need for a bio hazard cleanup company to be a first responder in any situation where it is believed that a biological weapon or virus has been deployed. The imperative that a bio hazard be neutralized may be no less important than defusing a ticking, conventional bomb.
Then there is also the need, should any such biological hazard be neutralized to make sure any and remnants of the hazard are identified, monitored and destroyed. To the extent that a virus is exposed to the greater public, either by accident or intentionally, the bio hazard cleaners must go beyond extinguishing the obvious manifestations of a virus. A stringent monitoring of any vicinity, within a certain radius dependent upon the nature of the targeted virus, is warranted to ensure that a contagious virus does not spread.
If a risk that a virus may have spread unabated, a good bio hazard cleaning company will advise people who may have occupied a particular area within range of a hazard or virus, to see a doctor or appropriate medical authorities.
If it can be satisfactorily confirmed that a hazard has been neutralized before it causes any harm, the ultimate targets of any terrorist attack, the public at large will be relieved from the very terror the terrorists wish to spread. The bio hazard cleanup companies hence can solve a practical problem, the extinguishment of a biological hazard. They can also be part of that homeland security designed to keep the populace at peace.
Hopefully you'll never have reason to see these folks dressed in blue, protective suits with masks in your neck of the woods. But in today's day and age, it won't be just in the movies.
Then there is also the need, should any such biological hazard be neutralized to make sure any and remnants of the hazard are identified, monitored and destroyed. To the extent that a virus is exposed to the greater public, either by accident or intentionally, the bio hazard cleaners must go beyond extinguishing the obvious manifestations of a virus. A stringent monitoring of any vicinity, within a certain radius dependent upon the nature of the targeted virus, is warranted to ensure that a contagious virus does not spread.
If a risk that a virus may have spread unabated, a good bio hazard cleaning company will advise people who may have occupied a particular area within range of a hazard or virus, to see a doctor or appropriate medical authorities.
If it can be satisfactorily confirmed that a hazard has been neutralized before it causes any harm, the ultimate targets of any terrorist attack, the public at large will be relieved from the very terror the terrorists wish to spread. The bio hazard cleanup companies hence can solve a practical problem, the extinguishment of a biological hazard. They can also be part of that homeland security designed to keep the populace at peace.
Hopefully you'll never have reason to see these folks dressed in blue, protective suits with masks in your neck of the woods. But in today's day and age, it won't be just in the movies.
Solving the Shortage of Medical Professionals!
When last I was living in Eastern Ontario, Canada, there was and still is a critical shortage of qualified doctors and nurses. Paramedics sometimes pulled up to a hospital's emergency entrance and were told they'd have to wait. There was no space or attendants to take responsibility for new patients at the moment. Paramedics do not have time to sit around twiddling their thumbs. They are on call 24/7 and cannot spend time sitting waiting for hospitals to get their acts together.
Similarly, there is a critical shortage of qualified nurses as well which compounds the problem. Why? Well, this may not be the only reason but there are always recruiting drives by large American hospitals offering substantially more to qualified nurses than Canadian hospitals pay. Canadian doctors and nurses are an important part of the brain drain to the USA. Who can blame them for wanting to make more money? But the victims are those people in the back of paramedic ambulances who cannot get proper and immediate care they deserve.
An off shoot of the shortage of doctors and nurses is that those who do work in hospitals and other healthcare facilities are often overworked and stressed out. Do you think this doesn't get passed along to the patients? Shorter tempers, less frequent attention and shorter time spent with patients can lead to more mistakes. The last figure I heard was that a patient seeing a doctor could expect to spent between 3-7 minutes with the doctor. My personal doctor had two consultation rooms on the go. While he was seeing one patient, the nurse/receptionist was getting the next one, medical file, etc. ready in the other room. Talk about an assembly line procedure. But what else can doctors do when there are more patients than the doctors can currently handle?
Operations can have up to a two year waiting list. What happens? Since 90% of Canadians live within 100 miles (sorry, 160 km) of the US border, many opt to go south where they receive immediate care - for a price. Canadian doctors are not allowed to charge for most immediate services. I am all in favour of the Canadian social medical system but you also have to look at the reality of what is happening and do more than give lip service to change. "We'll set up a Commission to study the problem." And who will be the distinguished members of this commission? Likely academics with little experience outside academia but lots of experience spending years on research and information-gathering projects - along with people in favour with the present government. Oh, and the cost...probably in the millions. And the time...a minimum of several years. Meanwhile, people are dying because they cannot get the immediate care they should get. I'd like to suggest how that money could be better spent. Read on!
The need for trained physicians has been critical across Canada and the USA for decades. With more foresight, schools should have responded to this need long ago. They are clearly not producing near enough qualified medicos - period. Universities and professors in their characteristically outmoded bowties continue to wander around hallowed corridors and sculpted campuses blissfully unaware of the needs of the real world. Even if some are aware, they are often victims of less than adequate government funding.
Guess what, folks. According to The Economist, within 10-15 years, scientists will have discovered the means to extend our lives by 10-20 years and within another 10 years or so after that, to extend out lives considerably more, possibly indefinitely. What does that mean to the medical profession? Think about it. Many more older folks will be needing medical treatment and eldercare. We can't cope now! How in blazes are we going to manage with a huge increase in seniors demanding our services?
Mind you, schools are not the only ones to blame here. It is time government took off their own bowties and started paying real attention to what is happening on the street. Surely, governments have futurists who can project and plan for these future events. Any government without a futurist should rush out and hire one immediately! I realize that not everything futurists say gets acted upon, particularly in the political arena. After all, it is all about votes. But consider this - if there is a critical shortage of physicians, how can a responsible government help? To me, there is a clear strategy for governments to adopt and to begin implementing immediately:
Much more government funding at the federal. provincial/state and municipal levels needs to be channelled into providing needed healthcare services and medical provider education. Now!
What would I do with the extra funding?
1. Subsidize medical training! Don't you think a lot more students would opt for a medical degree if it was half the cost of a BA, BBA or BSc - or for that matter even FREE? Do that and within a few years, we could solve that problem.
2. In the short term, we might consider opening the doors to qualified foreign doctors from overseas universities that have been approved by our government. This means easing immigration regulations but, as I suggested, it would be on a short-term basis until our own subsidized system kicked in. On the other hand, if it worked well, why not extend it? Sending medical professors abroad to qualify the resident medical trainers would seem to be a much better use of taxpayers money than setting up yet another lengthy commission - and the result would be much faster.
3. More immediate funding for universities and other medical training facilities. We cannot train more doctors and nurses without the facilities to do so.
4. Expanded hospital and health care facilities. Plainly, there are simply not enough hospital beds around for the number of patients that need them.
5. More seniors' home and long-term care facilities. My mother is going on 90 and is ready for such a home. Do you know, there is up to a two-year wait to get in to many of the better facilities in her area of 40,000 residents? More seniors are on the way and we'd better be ready for them!
Foresight, preparation and immediate action, folks!
Dr. Robert Taylor
Dr. Robert Taylor is an educator, writer and researcher with a futurist bent. He writes articles on many topics. He invites you to visit his blog http://www.salubriousday.net/coffee.htm where a fresh pot of coffee is always on!
Similarly, there is a critical shortage of qualified nurses as well which compounds the problem. Why? Well, this may not be the only reason but there are always recruiting drives by large American hospitals offering substantially more to qualified nurses than Canadian hospitals pay. Canadian doctors and nurses are an important part of the brain drain to the USA. Who can blame them for wanting to make more money? But the victims are those people in the back of paramedic ambulances who cannot get proper and immediate care they deserve.
An off shoot of the shortage of doctors and nurses is that those who do work in hospitals and other healthcare facilities are often overworked and stressed out. Do you think this doesn't get passed along to the patients? Shorter tempers, less frequent attention and shorter time spent with patients can lead to more mistakes. The last figure I heard was that a patient seeing a doctor could expect to spent between 3-7 minutes with the doctor. My personal doctor had two consultation rooms on the go. While he was seeing one patient, the nurse/receptionist was getting the next one, medical file, etc. ready in the other room. Talk about an assembly line procedure. But what else can doctors do when there are more patients than the doctors can currently handle?
Operations can have up to a two year waiting list. What happens? Since 90% of Canadians live within 100 miles (sorry, 160 km) of the US border, many opt to go south where they receive immediate care - for a price. Canadian doctors are not allowed to charge for most immediate services. I am all in favour of the Canadian social medical system but you also have to look at the reality of what is happening and do more than give lip service to change. "We'll set up a Commission to study the problem." And who will be the distinguished members of this commission? Likely academics with little experience outside academia but lots of experience spending years on research and information-gathering projects - along with people in favour with the present government. Oh, and the cost...probably in the millions. And the time...a minimum of several years. Meanwhile, people are dying because they cannot get the immediate care they should get. I'd like to suggest how that money could be better spent. Read on!
The need for trained physicians has been critical across Canada and the USA for decades. With more foresight, schools should have responded to this need long ago. They are clearly not producing near enough qualified medicos - period. Universities and professors in their characteristically outmoded bowties continue to wander around hallowed corridors and sculpted campuses blissfully unaware of the needs of the real world. Even if some are aware, they are often victims of less than adequate government funding.
Guess what, folks. According to The Economist, within 10-15 years, scientists will have discovered the means to extend our lives by 10-20 years and within another 10 years or so after that, to extend out lives considerably more, possibly indefinitely. What does that mean to the medical profession? Think about it. Many more older folks will be needing medical treatment and eldercare. We can't cope now! How in blazes are we going to manage with a huge increase in seniors demanding our services?
Mind you, schools are not the only ones to blame here. It is time government took off their own bowties and started paying real attention to what is happening on the street. Surely, governments have futurists who can project and plan for these future events. Any government without a futurist should rush out and hire one immediately! I realize that not everything futurists say gets acted upon, particularly in the political arena. After all, it is all about votes. But consider this - if there is a critical shortage of physicians, how can a responsible government help? To me, there is a clear strategy for governments to adopt and to begin implementing immediately:
Much more government funding at the federal. provincial/state and municipal levels needs to be channelled into providing needed healthcare services and medical provider education. Now!
What would I do with the extra funding?
1. Subsidize medical training! Don't you think a lot more students would opt for a medical degree if it was half the cost of a BA, BBA or BSc - or for that matter even FREE? Do that and within a few years, we could solve that problem.
2. In the short term, we might consider opening the doors to qualified foreign doctors from overseas universities that have been approved by our government. This means easing immigration regulations but, as I suggested, it would be on a short-term basis until our own subsidized system kicked in. On the other hand, if it worked well, why not extend it? Sending medical professors abroad to qualify the resident medical trainers would seem to be a much better use of taxpayers money than setting up yet another lengthy commission - and the result would be much faster.
3. More immediate funding for universities and other medical training facilities. We cannot train more doctors and nurses without the facilities to do so.
4. Expanded hospital and health care facilities. Plainly, there are simply not enough hospital beds around for the number of patients that need them.
5. More seniors' home and long-term care facilities. My mother is going on 90 and is ready for such a home. Do you know, there is up to a two-year wait to get in to many of the better facilities in her area of 40,000 residents? More seniors are on the way and we'd better be ready for them!
Foresight, preparation and immediate action, folks!
Dr. Robert Taylor
Dr. Robert Taylor is an educator, writer and researcher with a futurist bent. He writes articles on many topics. He invites you to visit his blog http://www.salubriousday.net/coffee.htm where a fresh pot of coffee is always on!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)